<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Critical Sobolev Exponent on Nam Le</title><link>https://blog.namln.org/en/tags/critical-sobolev-exponent/</link><description>Recent content in Critical Sobolev Exponent on Nam Le</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.namln.org/en/tags/critical-sobolev-exponent/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Brezis' first open problem - An elliptic equation involving the critical exponent in 3D</title><link>https://blog.namln.org/en/posts/brezis-first-open-problem/</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://blog.namln.org/en/posts/brezis-first-open-problem/</guid><description>&lt;h2 class="heading" id="yamabe-problem"&gt;
 Yamabe problem&lt;span class="heading__anchor"&gt; &lt;a href="#yamabe-problem"&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yamabe problem: Suppose $(\mathcal{M}, g_0)$ is a compact closed Riemannian manifold with dimension $N \geq 3$, does there exist a conformal metric $g = u^{\frac{4}{N-2}}g_0$ which has constant scalar curvature $R_g \equiv C$?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Find $u &amp;gt; 0$ on $\mathcal{M}$ such that
$$
-\frac{4(N-1)}{N-2}\Delta_{g_0}u + R_{g_0}u = Cu^{\frac{N+2}{N-2}}\qquad\text{on }\mathcal{M}.
$$&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some results:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Trudinger [1968]: if $g$ has non-positive scalar curvature.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Aubin [1976]: $N \geq 6$ and $(\mathcal{M}, g)$ not locally conformally flat.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Schoen [1984]: any dimension, the remaining cases, assuming the Positive Mass Theorem by Schoen-Yau [1979].&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;h2 class="heading" id="a-special-case"&gt;
 A special case&lt;span class="heading__anchor"&gt; &lt;a href="#a-special-case"&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;Consider the special case where $\mathcal{M}$ is a bounded domain $\Omega$ in $\mathbb{R}^{N}$:
$$
\begin{cases}
-\Delta u = u^{\frac{N+2}{N-2}}\qquad\text{in }\Omega, \\
u &amp;gt; 0\qquad\text{in }\Omega, \\
u = 0\qquad\text{on }\partial\Omega.
\end{cases}
$$&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pohozaev [1965]: if $\Omega$ is star-shaped, then there is no nontrivial solution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 class="heading" id="brezis-nirenberg-problem"&gt;
 Brezis-Nirenberg problem&lt;span class="heading__anchor"&gt; &lt;a href="#brezis-nirenberg-problem"&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;Consider a lower-order perturbation:
$$
\begin{cases}
-\Delta u = u^{\frac{N+2}{N-2}} + \lambda u\qquad\text{in }\Omega, \\
u &amp;gt; 0\qquad\text{in }\Omega, \\
u = 0\qquad\text{on }\partial\Omega.
\end{cases}
$$&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some results:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Pohozaev&amp;rsquo;s result also yields nonexistence when $\lambda \leq 0$ and $\Omega$ is star-shaped.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;If a positive solution exists, then necessarily $\lambda &amp;lt; \lambda_1$, where $\lambda_1$ is the first eigenvalue of $-\Delta$ on $\Omega$ with zero Dirichlet boundary condition.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hence, for positive solutions on star-shaped domains,
$$
0 &amp;lt; \lambda &amp;lt; \lambda_1.
$$&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 class="heading" id="brezis-open-problem-11"&gt;
 Brezis&amp;rsquo; Open Problem 1.1&lt;span class="heading__anchor"&gt; &lt;a href="#brezis-open-problem-11"&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let $N=3$, and let $\Omega = B_1 \subset \mathbb{R}^3$ be the unit ball. Consider
$$
\begin{cases}
-\Delta u = u^5 + \lambda u \qquad \text{in } B_1, \\
u = 0 \qquad \text{on } \partial B_1.
\end{cases}
$$
We ask whether this problem admits a nontrivial positive solution $u \not\equiv 0$.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here the exponent $5 = \frac{N+2}{N-2}$ is the critical Sobolev exponent when $N=3$, and this is exactly the source of the main compactness difficulty.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let $\lambda_1$ be the first Dirichlet eigenvalue of $-\Delta$ on $B_1$. The classical Brezis-Nirenberg theory shows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;If $\lambda \leq 0$, then the only solution is $u \equiv 0$.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;If $\frac{1}{4}\lambda_1 &amp;lt; \lambda &amp;lt; \lambda_1$, then there exists a positive radial solution.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;If $0 &amp;lt; \lambda \leq \frac{1}{4}\lambda_1$, then any radial solution must be trivial; hence there is no positive radial solution.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;If $\lambda &amp;gt; \lambda_1$, there exist sign-changing solutions, but no positive solution.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Therefore the unresolved case is:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Open Problem 1.1.&lt;/strong&gt; Assume
$$
0 &amp;lt; \lambda \leq \frac{1}{4}\lambda_1.
$$
Does there exist a nontrivial solution?&lt;br&gt;
Equivalently, since no positive radial solution can exist in this range, can there exist a non-radial positive solution?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This problem has remained open for decades, even if one restricts further to a smaller interval such as
$$
0 &amp;lt; \lambda &amp;lt; \varepsilon
$$
for some sufficiently small $\varepsilon &amp;gt; 0$.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 class="heading" id="remarks"&gt;
 Remarks&lt;span class="heading__anchor"&gt; &lt;a href="#remarks"&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;A few points are worth emphasizing:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;By the Gidas-Ni-Nirenberg symmetry principle, positive solutions on a ball are often expected to be radial; however, in this regime Brezis observed that any radial solution must vanish, so any eventual positive solution would have to be genuinely non-radial.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;This makes dimension $3$ sharply different from higher-dimensional cases, where the Brezis-Nirenberg existence theory is better understood.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The bifurcation picture suggests branches of sign-changing non-radial solutions emerging from higher eigenvalues, but it is not known whether such branches can reach the interval $\left(0,\frac14\lambda_1\right]$.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;h2 class="heading" id="references"&gt;
 References&lt;span class="heading__anchor"&gt; &lt;a href="#references"&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;H. Brezis and L. Nirenberg, &lt;em&gt;Positive solutions of nonlinear elliptic equations involving critical Sobolev exponents&lt;/em&gt;, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 36 (1983), 437&amp;ndash;477.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;H. Brezis, &lt;em&gt;Some of My Favorite Open Problems&lt;/em&gt;, Open Problem 1.1.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;M. Comte, &lt;em&gt;Solutions of elliptic equations with critical Sobolev exponent in dimension three&lt;/em&gt;, Nonlinear Anal. 17 (1991), 445&amp;ndash;455.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;O. Druet, &lt;em&gt;Elliptic equations with critical Sobolev exponents in dimension 3&lt;/em&gt;, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 19 (2002), 125&amp;ndash;142.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>